data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b.
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
As in bar 1, the category imprint: |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
It is difficult to say how the difference in the indications at the beginning of the piece occurred. As legato was not being removed in FC, it was probably added by Chopin in the stage of proofreading FE or to the basis thereof. One of these scenarios presented an opportunity for a possible removal of category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: No initial dynamic marking , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
Differences in the wording of the title – see the Mazurka in C minor no. 1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The absence of the indication in FC (→GE) suggests that the decision concerning a dedication came relatively late in the publishing process of the Mazurkas. See the Mazurka in C minor no. 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Dedications |
||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |